Boll – Ovtcharov: the battle for the German crown

Dimitrij Ovtcharov
Dimitrij Ovtcharov competing for TTC Fakel Gazprom Orenburg. Photo: Verein

The club competitions season is about to finish and the 2016/2017 Table Tennis Champions League Men have recently had the first leg of the finals played. Borussia Düsseldorf, from Germany, and TTC Fakel Gazprom Orenburg, from Russia, reached the last stage of the European most prestigious club tournament. With a 0-3 result for the Russian team, it seems that the team composed of Jun Mizutani, Dimitrij Ovtcharov and Vladimir Samsonov will not find trouble to conquer one more title for Orenburg’s team.

However, the finals started in a thrilling way, as the first match was played by the two best German and European players in the recent – and not so recent – times: Timo Boll and Dimitrij Ovtcharov. The match result: 2-3 (11-7, 5-11, 8-11, 11-6, 12-14) for Ovtcharov, who managed to make his higher World Ranking position prevail and gave TTC Fakel Gazprom the first point of the leg.

In this article, we will analyze the match between Timo Boll and Dimitij Ovtcharov, presenting some stats, charts and insights that will help us understand the key factors that explain the result.

The match

Düsseldorf, the capital of table tennis, was the stage for the battle between Timo Boll and Dimitrij Ovtcharov. The match was totally up to the expectations, getting to the very last set and having many exciting rallies.

First set was easily controlled by Boll, which finished it 11-7. Short rallies, with the longest being only six shots, and a subtle aspect: Ovtcharov’s trouble when flicking. He was not able to take the initiative when attacking on Boll’s short serves, which made him lose the point whenever he tried: four times.

Second set just changed the fashion, and Ovtcharov led it since the beginning. He achieved a 0-3 advantage first, 4-7 later and a final 5-11 to tie the match. Four forehand topspin mistakes did not help Boll to compete properly. However, the key moment of the second set was when being 4-6. Boll did a bad job returning both Ovtcharov’s serves, and he won those points with two third-ball winners.

The third set of the match had much longer rallies than the previous ones. This seemed to play in favour of Ovtcharov, as Boll lacked some power when far from the table and found it difficult to reach alternating forehand and backhand balls. A leading 2-6 was almost overcome by Boll, who forced his opponent to use his timeout with a 6-7 in the scoreboard. However, a controversial let – ball touched the net according to the referee – after Boll had already won the point, made him lose his focus and fail his service when being 7-8 down. The set score: 8-11 for Ovtcharov.

Boll’s experience during his long career was needed at that moment. In the fourth set, he reestablished his competitive mood and got a leading 3-0, which would never see reduced, to quickly finish the set 11-6. However, Ovtcharov’s passivity did really influence the result, as he opted for blocking more often than counterattacking, like he did in the previous sets.

The last and deciding set was led by Ovtcharov almost since the beginning. A 1-6 was followed by a 6-9 and then 7-10, which resulted in three match balls for the younger German player. Nonetheless, Boll saved all of them, and got two match balls in a row (11-10 and 12-11), which he could not win. An exceptional block after a stunning forehand flick by Boll allowed Ovtcharov to keep having chances in the set, which he finally won 12-14, to conquer the match with a 2-3 in the set scoreboard.

Match highlights can be watched in this video:

The numbers

Let’s start first with some basic stats about the match:


It is obvious that the whole match was pretty tight, as both players have a similar figures. However, there is one aspect which differs: the amount of winners that Ovtcharov had, eleven,  far from Boll’s, who only achieved seven.

Now we are going to take a look at how the rally length evolved during the match:


As the match went by, the rally length increased, from an average rally length of 4.16 shots in the first set to 6.58 and 5.26 in the fourth and fifth sets. Boll seemed to be more comfortable with shorter rallies, while Ovtcharov tended to play better far from the table and lobbing.

The list of the longest rallies of the match confirms the hypothesis:

Rally length Winner
23 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
20 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
15 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
13 Timo Boll
12 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
11 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
11 Timo Boll
11 Timo Boll
10 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
10 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
9 Timo Boll
9 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
9 Timo Boll
9 Timo Boll
9 Dimitrij Ovtcharov
9 Dimitrij Ovtcharov

Regarding the kind of strokes that each player used, the following pie charts give a brief view into this:


Both players have a similar distribution of shots. However, there are slight differences between them. As usual, Ovtcharov uses more backhand shots than his opponent. This time, 103 out of his 211 shots, which represents almost 50%. On the other hand, Boll’s forehand shots are almost 60% of all his shots.

Apart from that, Boll’s usage of forehand flick is almost inexistent, only 4 times, compared to Ovtcharov, who used it 12 times. This enabled him to attack shorter balls and take the game initiative.

Let’s see now the winners and mistakes ratio, classified by kind of shot:

winners_and_mistakes_boll winners_and_mistakes_ovtcharov

It is obvious that the attacking skills of Ovtcharov stood out, specially compared to Boll’s. As can be seen, Boll’s mistakes with his forehand topspin account for almost half of his total amount of failed shots. On the other hand, Ovtcharov had 6 backhand topspin winners, which are almost as many winners as all Boll’s.

Going deeper on this matter, we realize that 4 out of the 18 mistakes that Boll made with his forehand topspin happened when trying to return Ovtcharov’s serve. However, here it comes a remarkable fact: Ovtcharov only performed 2 backhand serves out of his 47 attempts during the whole match. According to our previous article analyzing his serve, it is a quite strange thing on him, as he usually has a much bigger amount of his widely-known backhand sidespin serves.

The keys

After examining the match and all the insights we got into its stats, we are able to get some conclusions about the key factors that determined the result.

At first glance, it seems that Boll struggled when Ovtcharov was able to take the initiative and move him out of the table. Boll found difficulties when counterattacking, specially when swapping from forehand to backhand and viceversa.

Furthermore, Boll lost his focus twice in the match: after the controversial let and when he failed to return two services in a row. Ovtcharov took advantage of it to secure two sets in a row that were enough for him to get to the last match. Even with a lower performance in the fourth set and three match balls lost in a row, Ovtcharov managed to keep his chances with a high-class block that stopped one of the few forehand flicks that Boll attempted in the match, and ended getting a match that both of them could have won.

A tight rivalry

According to the ITTF website, Boll and Ovtcharov have played nine times in international competitions. Ovtcharov leads this particular German battle, with five victories.

This time, he made it happen again. Nevertheless, the match finished in the fifth and last set, and both players had match balls, which shows how tight the match was. Boll, who is already 36 years old, is still more than competitive against European players. In fact, in the German league, with only the final remaining, he has a won 12 matches and lost only once, which makes him one of the best players of the season.

Both players will compete at the 2017 World Championships played in Düsseldorf in less than three weeks, and the draw may offer us the chance to see them again in the same table. Moreover, the second leg of the 2016/2017 Champions League might replay this match once more. In any case, the bets will be tight and the spectacle, guaranteed.

∗ Cover photo by: DPA

∗ Videos by:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s